HOME ABOUT US NEWS & ARTICLES LEGAL COMMUNITY CONTACT US July 30, 2010
Communication
             
 
Selecting a communication attorney for your legal case is a very important decision. Please enter a zip code to find an attorney that serves your area:
 
Zip Code:  
 

Virginia Communication Lawyers

 
 

< Back to Virginia Communication Resources

In Many Cases, Precious Time Can Be Lost While Dispatchers Relay Emergency Communications

The objective of interoperability is for persons who need to exchange information to be able to do so, even when they are using incompatible radios, without the need for custom equipment. However, when agencies from different or multiple jurisdictions need to mount a coordinated response today (whether during standard operational activities, critical incidents, mutual aid events, or task force operations), they may not be able to talk to each other via their radios due to incompatible radio equipment. Public safety radio systems operate in different frequency bands (like the AM and FM bands of a radio). Just as an AM radio cannot pick up an FM radio station, public safety radios in one frequency band cannot pick up transmissions in another frequency band.

As a consequence, when responding to a major incident, agencies have used many inefficient methods to relay messages. Whether as part of standard operational activities or a major incident, the ability of public safety agencies to coordinate and respond immediately is severely tested. In many cases, precious time can be lost while dispatchers relay emergency communications. The advent of more sophisticated radio systems such as digital trunking systems compounds this problem. Digital trunked radio systems are designed and manufactured so that, even if two such radio systems are both operating in same frequency band, broadcasts from one manufacturer’s radio cannot be heard by another manufacturer’s radio, or vice versa. Although interoperability could be achieved if all agencies in a region purchased compatible equipment to operate in a single frequency band, such a solution is not feasible. The cost of replacing existing equipment is too high for many agencies, especially considering that characteristics of different frequency bands may require placement of additional equipment and construction of additional towers. Also, characteristics of different frequency bands are such that the best solution for one agency may not be the best solution for another agency (characteristics of different frequencies are such that some operate more effectively in urban areas, others in rural areas, and so on). Finally, frequencies may not be available to support all agencies in a single band.

Contact a Communication Lawyer now for a free case review.

Contact Virginia Communication Attorneys



Contact a Communication Attorney for the following Virginia cities:

  • Alexandria
  • Annandale
  • Arlington
  • Ashburn
  • Blacksburg
  • Burke
  • Centreville
  • Charlottesville
  • Chesapeake
  • Chester
  • Chesterfield
  • Christiansburg
  • Colonial Heights
  • Culpeper
  • Danville
  • Dumfries
  • Fairfax
  • Falls Church
  • Fredericksburg
  • Front Royal
  • Glen Allen
  • Hampton
  • Harrisonburg
  • Herndon
  • Hopewell
  • Leesburg
  • Lorton
  • Lynchburg
  • Manassas
  • Martinsville
  • Mc Lean
  • Mechanicsville
  • Midlothian
  • Newport News
  • Norfolk
  • Petersburg
  • Portsmouth
  • Powhatan
  • Radford
  • Reston
  • Richmond
  • Roanoke
  • Salem
  • Spotsylvania
  • Springfield
  • Stafford
  • Staunton
  • Sterling
  • Suffolk
  • Vienna
  • Virginia Beach
  • Waynesboro
  • Williamsburg
  • Winchester
  • Woodbridge
  • Yorktown

Contact a Communication Lawyer now for a free case review.

 

 
  Latest News  
   
  Regional Resources
 
Alabama
Missouri
Alaska Montana
Arizona Nebraska
Arkansas Nevada
California New Hampshire
Colorado New Jersey
Connecticut New Mexico
DC New York
Delaware North Carolina
Florida North Dakota
Georgia Ohio
Hawaii Oklahoma
Idaho Oregon
Illinois Pennsylvania
Indiana Rhode Island
Iowa South Carolina
Kansas South Dakota
Kentucky Tennessee
Louisiana Texas
Maine Utah
Maryland Vermont
Massachusetts Virginia
Michigan Washington
Minnesota West Virginia
Mississippi Wisconsin
  Wyoming
Browse Map >
  Hot Topics
 
  • Copyright Law
  • RIAA
  • MPAA
  • Slander
  • Libel
  • Patents
  • Trademarks
  Did You Know?
 
Obscene Speech is Not Protected by the First Amendment

Obscene speech is not protected by the First Amendment and cannot be broadcast at any time. The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) may revoke a station license, impose a monetary forfeiture, withhold or place conditions on the renewal of a broadcast license, or issue a warning, for the broadcast of obscene or indecent material.

To be obscene, material must meet a three-prong test:

An average person, applying contemporary community standards, must find that the material, as a whole, appeals to the prurient interest;

The material must depict or describe, in a patently offensive way, sexual conduct specifically defined by applicable law; and

The material, taken as a whole, must lack serious literary, artistic, political, or scientific value.


 


Legal Disclaimers
All attorney listings are a paid attorney advertisement, and do not in any way constitute a referral or endorsement by an approved or authorized lawyer referral service. The information provided on Communication Law Firms.com is not intended to be legal advice, but merely conveys general information related to legal issues commonly encountered. Please contact a local attorney in your area for official legal and law information. Your access to and use of this website is subject to additional Terms and Conditions.

Local Professional? Generate new business today
Call 866-227-9356 or contact a sales rep


This site is part of the LawFirms.com Network
©2010 ExpertHub, wholly owned subsidiary of MoxyMedia, Inc.